# 028 May 14, 2009
By: Allen Wells
Editors Note: I’m sorry it’s been a while since I’ve written, I know many of you can’t have your morning coffee or start your day off right without my introspective, intelligent words of wisdom (humor). I’ve been very busy lately (that’s a good thing, gotta make the doughnuts). Thank you for your inquiries and your interest in the blog. I promise I will do better.
Here we go, more idiocy from Washington and everywhere else in the world… is it my perspective, or is the multi-national business world and the political world going stark raving mad? In actuality, I believe normal, everyday people and businesses are working diligently and honestly to get by, make things work and to make clear, appropriate decisions in this time of [near] economic chaos.
The problem, as I see it, is a dearth of truth from government and quasi-government organizations. Fedzilla is spoon feeding us lies with help and collusion from the “main stream” media. Here are a few examples (I could give you more, but it might end up being a ten chapter book!):
Foreclosures and the Housing Market
The Story: Major news services and mainstream television news are replete with stories as how the housing market is making a comeback and that new home sales are up.
The Truth: Foreclosures jumped 32% last month. This is in the residential market and U.S. median house prices are down 14% from the first quarter last year. If you recall, our government overseers have been telling us that first quarter last year (2008) was the “bottom” and things are looking up… but let’s not mention the debacle that awaits us with the option arm resets due in 2010.
“In the last three years, housing starts have plunged from 1,823,000 to 358,000, or 80.4%. At the February sales rate, it will take 12.2 months to clear the inventory of new homes for sale, versus 5 months in a healthy market. In the past year, the median price of a new home has fallen from $251,000 to $200,900, a drop of 20%.” This information from John Mauldin’s Investor Insight Newsletter.
Unemployment
The Story: The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported last week that the economy added 226,000 jobs last month from (get this) “business creation”. I’m not sure about this… I’ve taken a look around, maybe I’m looking in the wrong areas – has anyone out there noticed a surge in new businesses? Hello, this is a recession, I’ve seen a lot of businesses close and not many open! Truth is, Fedzilla needed some good news so they made up a way to report some good news.
The Truth: April job losses were reported at around 600,000 with Fedzilla creating about 72,000 of those jobs. Folks, if Fedzilla is creating jobs by hiring more government employees, we are paying for it… either through higher taxes or higher inflation – there is no other way around it.
Here is what is really going on with the unemployment figures, from John Mauldin’s Weekly E-Letter:
“First, there are actually two surveys done by the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). One is the household survey, where they call up a fixed number of homes each month and ask about the employment situation in the household and then take that data and extrapolate it for the economy as a whole. So, while the number of employed rose, the number of unemployed rose a lot faster, by 563,000 to 13.7 million. In addition, there are 2.1 million who are "marginally attached" to the workforce. These individuals wanted and were available for work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey.
According to the survey, headline unemployment rose 0.4% to 8.9%, the highest level since 1983. But if you count those who are working part-time but want full-time work, as well as the "marginally attached," the unemployment rate (called the U-6 rate) is an ugly 15.8%.
For whatever reason, the markets were happy that the headline number of the other BLS survey, the establishment survey of lost jobs, was "only" 539,000, down from a negatively revised 699,000 in March. At least, the thinking was, the numbers were not getting worse, though it is hard for me to be encouraged by half a million lost jobs. That may not be the worst of it, however, since 66,000 jobs were temporary workers hired for the 2010 census, and the BLS estimated that the birth-death ratio added 226,000 jobs as a result of new business creation. Really? This will mean that there will likely be a major revision downward at some future point. The number will likely be well over 600,000 in the final analysis.
Further, it is likely that we will see at least another 1.0-1.5 million lost jobs over the rest of the year, taking unemployment very close to 10%. As an aside, the Treasury used an unemployment rate of 9.5% in their stress test of the banks, which suggests the test was not all that stressful. And, showing further weakness, there were 66,000 fewer temporary jobs. If there was really a nascent recovery, you would see a rise in temporary workers.
Average wages rose by a mere 3.2% on an annual basis, and by just 0.1% for the month, and the average work week was at an all-time record low of 33.2 hours. In nearly any inflation scenario, rising wages play an important part. This suggests that inflation is not in our near future.”
“The economy needs to create 125,000 jobs each month, just to absorb the number of new entrants into the labor market. If job growth were to average 325,000 per month in coming years, it would still take four years to replace all the jobs lost in this recession. With so much excess labor capacity, wage growth will be weak for the next few years, which will make it harder for consumers to increase savings and spending. The combination of less credit availability, weaker business investment and consumer spending will be headwinds whenever the economy emerges from this recession.”
Government Intervention into Business
The Story: Fedzilla is here to help, bailing out and “assisting” those “too big to fail”.
The Truth: The Fed, the Treasury Department and the Obama Administration are trampling the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law, becoming more bold and more blatant as each day passes. Consider these examples:
The Chrysler bankruptcy – bankruptcies are never fast, never streamlined and never easy. Article V of the Constitution prohibits States from interfering with the obligation to pay debts. Chrysler bondholders (holding a secured interest in Chrysler) have been browbeat and bullied by the Obama administration into accepting 30 cents on the dollar for their interests. Secured bondholders hold a secured interest in the business, this is why these bonds are more popular and pay a lower return than unsecured bonds. Fedzilla has manipulated and cajoled these bondholders in violation of the “absolute priority” rule – only to [plan to] turn around and give the company to Fiat with no money down, no recourse and government backed loan guarantees. As a side note, the Auto Workers Union will receive 50 cents on the dollar for their “junior creditor claims”… where is the outrage?
The Nationalization of Banks
The Story: Fedzilla does not want to own banks and does not want to “nationalize” our banking system. All they want is to restore the stability and confidence in the U.S. banking system.
The Truth: The recent “stress tests” were a farce, manipulated by the Fed to give a semblance of respectability back to the major “too big to fail” financial institutions (most of which have contributed greatly to Democratic campaign funds). TARP was a grab for power that has succeeded far beyond any expectations. Americans have complacently agreed to allow the USG to take over our banks through the back door, loaning billions of dollars and then refusing to allow the banks to pay the money back.
Just announced the “administration is in early talks on ways to curb compensation across finance.” This bank pay overhaul will included banks that received TARP and other federal bailout funds, and banks that did not receive TARP and other federal bailout funds!
I’m curious, if a private business person (let’s call him Guido) loaned money to multiple businesses in his neighborhood, then refused to allow them to pay him back and instead required ownership in the business, continued payments and a say in how to run the business including dictating how much the owners and employees can be paid… wouldn’t we call this extortion? Or perhaps racketeering? Isn’t there a statute under federal law (known as the RICO statute) that is already used by the federal government on a regular basis to trample citizens rights?
Let’s take it a step further, once our enterprising businessman Guido get’s the businesses he’s loaned money to under his control, then he (as a result of the power he wields over the biggest businesses in the neighborhood) goes to the smaller businesses and makes them this offer (with a smile and a wink), “I now control all the major businesses in the neighborhood. If I choose to let them fail or go out of business, you will go out of business also because you need them to fund your business and supply products and services. From this point forward, I am going to dictate how much you can pay your employees and what your owners can be paid. I am doing this because I do not want your business to be able to hire personnel from the businesses I control. If you do not go along with this plan, I will bring in my “regulators” and shut your business down.”
I’m just asking, isn’t this extortion? Isn’t this racketeering? Why is Fedzilla allowed to do this? Where is the outrage? This is idiocy and Americans are going along with this blatant takeover of the entire country without so much as a whimper!
“There are only two truly infinite things: the universe and stupidity. And I am not so sure about the universe.” Albert Einstein
With warmth and regards (as always),
Allen
To reply or comment:
http://voicecafe.blogspot.com